Amazon’s recent anti-author stance is distressing. What they are saying in effect is “we think every author’s book is worth the same low price no matter how good it is.”

Well, here’s how they actually phrase it: “…we will want to offer them to you even at prices we believe are needlessly high for e-books. Amazon customers will at that point decide for themselves whether they believe it’s reasonable to pay $14.99 for a bestselling e-book”

Note the adjective bestselling. So for example if you want a “bestselling” or in other words desirable, luxury or similar descriptive, would you expect to pay the same as for an general, run of the mill car, diamond ring, etc. In other words, should a Tiffany diamond ring cost the same as a Zale’s diamond ring? Should a Mercedes cost the same as a Kia? Should a top brand author’s books be the same price as all other authors?

If Amazon wants to start selling all products for the same price regardless of brand, I’ll be the first one in line for the Apple MacBook Air at the same price as the Dell Inspiron. In fact, I’ll take three.

The one issue I have with the Kindle is that it’s limited to reading black and white text primarily. I’ve been waiting for something to come along that will allow a top-notch reading experience but also provide a thrilling multi-media experience as well. The hints surrounding Apple’s secretive meeting with publishing industry giants has me intrigued. Will we finally see a device where authors can reach out to their audience with every tool at hand?

Imagine the possibilities….(no, don’t burst my bubble yet with reality like slow internet connections or dodgy Wi-Fi or faded colors- for now I’ll just dream…)

“It’s all right. I came back.”

Sorry wrong play. In this one, it’s Anne Writer, in a black shift, moaning and pulling her hair out (while rocking on the floor surrounded by fluttering pages thick with type). Anne Writer turns to her mother (in slinky gold gown with black lacquered cigarette holder causally dangling from her exquisite hand). “Why won’t any one read my 500,000 word epic poem on the atomic bomb?”

“The slush pile passed on in 1991, darling. Stop throwing paper into the coffin. It makes you look mentally deficient.”

“JK Rowling was rejected 12 times. I think I can…I think I can…publish.” Anne glares at her mother with a wild look in her eye.

“She had an agent, darling. Now rub the ink stains off your fingers, we’ve a nice young man coming for dinner.”

And there’s the crux of it…Thank you Wall Street Journal for telling us writers we need an agent. Many more thanks for the lovely interviews with Joshua Ferris and Joyce Carol Oates.

Recently I read the first two Stieg Larsson detective novels. I had to wait weeks for each one at my local library because the waiting list was pretty long.

I believe one reason these novels are so popular is the female protagonist. Mr. Larsson created a very engaging and unusual female character, Lisbeth. I admit I liked her much better than the male protagonist. What makes her so interesting? I feel the whole constellation of traits, particularly her intelligence combined with her anti-social behavior (bordering on Asperger’s syndrome). Some people debate whether a man can create an accurate female character or a woman an accurate male character. I feel Larsson has done an excellent job with Lisbeth. Lisbeth may not be a “girly girl”, but she is believable as a female character. One aspect Larsson gets right is Lisbeth’s emotional involvement with people in her life. In contrast, his male protagonist (Blomkvist) often seems disconnected with people around him.

I am still waiting for the third book (another long long list of readers). Interest in reading these books is still amazingly strong. I was motivated to read the first book after observing a woman buying five copies of the first book at a large  (to be unnamed) book store.

The saddest part of the story is that Stieg Larsson is no longer with us to keep the story going. I can only imagine what other fantastic books he’d had written if he’d had time.